Calculateur de Taux de Succès de Subvention
Calculez le taux de succès de vos demandes de subvention.
Relative Citation Ratio
2.02
Relative Citation Ratio vs Journal Average Citations per Article
Formule
## Understanding Relative Journal Impact Comparing raw citation counts across fields is misleading because citation rates differ dramatically. The Relative Citation Ratio normalizes for this. ### Formula **Relative Impact = Journal Avg Citations / Field Avg Citations** **Citation Advantage = (Journal Avg - Field Avg) x Number of Articles** A ratio above 1.0 means the journal receives more citations than the field average. This helps researchers choose where to submit for maximum visibility.
Exemple Résolu
A journal averages 8.5 citations per article vs. the field average of 4.2. The researcher has 3 articles there.
- 01Relative impact: 8.5 / 4.2 = 2.02
- 02Expected citations: 8.5 x 3 = 25.5
- 03Field expected: 4.2 x 3 = 12.6
- 04Citation advantage: (8.5 - 4.2) x 3 = 12.9
Questions Fréquentes
What is a good relative impact score?
A ratio above 1.0 means above-field-average. Ratios of 2.0+ indicate a top-tier journal in its field.
Should I only publish in high-impact journals?
Not necessarily. Consider fit, audience, turnaround time, and open access. A well-placed article in a specialized journal may have more practical impact.
How do I find field average citation rates?
Databases like Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar provide field-level citation benchmarks.